De Wolf's note is also one of the standards right now, and more up-to-date than the QC&QI book: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09415

Thanks for this.

I’ve recently become very interested in QC and purchased and read Quantum Computation and quantum Information which I think is the standard book on the subject right now.

I’m even more interested in applying what I’ve learned but I’m at a loss as to how to begin working in the industry. Aside from getting a new masters degree I wouldn’t know where to begin and resources on the matter are understandably sparse.

Show 3 replies

I made a podcast in NotebookLM once I saw equations. Enjoy https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/bc7616c4-1c71-4a04-b2... Show 1 reply

Of course, no discussion of quantum annealing, the only practical form of quantum computation that is likely to exist at scale in our lifetimes. Show 2 replies

Very funny to me that lecture 21 is one of the only lecture titles that doesn't reference the name of the originator.

I feel like I've seen/done this before. Could I be stuck in a groundhog day? Show 1 reply

Well right now I am very skeptical, but I think we have somewhat given quantum computing plenty of time (we have given it decades) unless someone can convince me that it is not a scam.

Right now it hasn't amounted to anything useful, other than Shor's and 'experiments' and promises and applications that are no better done on a GPU rack right now.

Show 12 replies

How can a person become so good at researching ? Show 4 replies

As soon as a math equation comes up I get lost.