Court rejects Verizon claim that selling location data without consent is legal

(arstechnica.com)

Comments

bilekas 11 September 2025
Verizon disputed this not because the fine was in ANY way impactful, but because they wanted to push to see if they could legally do it without any repercussions. In their last quarter alone they made over 9k million USD, if I'm reading it right [0].

> Verizon chose to pay fine, giving up right to jury trial

40Million fine is a cost of doing business, but my question is if people's data was sold without consent, why is a class action not taken against them? Where is the right of the injured party here ?

[0 ]https://www.verizon.com/about/investors/quarterly-reports/2q...

jimmySixDOF 11 September 2025
Will this protection extend to automobile companies ? Mobile Apps ? Mobile OSs ? I have lost track of the number of leakage points for location data into the tarball of databrokers.
autoexec 11 September 2025
The courts have decided that Verizon selling location data without consent is illegal but I'd be willing to bet that the courts haven't decided that it should be unprofitable.

I'd be surprised if Verizon and the other companies haven't made more than enough money by breaking the law back in 2018 to rake in a nice profit even after the fines they're trying to weasel out of paying now.

I have no doubt that they're still selling our data one way or another anyway. We know for a fact that they've never stopped selling data to to law enforcement, they just require a rubber stamped court order/subpoena to do it.

fn-mote 11 September 2025
I like this part:

[denied because…] > Verizon had, and chose to forgo, the opportunity for a jury trial in federal court.

xnx 12 September 2025
Too bad the US spent so much time prosecuting Google, which never sells personal tracking information, instead of Verizon Which sells everyone's data and is also a ISP monopoly in many places.
monksy 11 September 2025
Assuming they'll lose this, they'll probably move to coercing the selling of your location data as "part of doing business with them." Sigh.
1vuio0pswjnm7 11 September 2025
sidcool 11 September 2025
Thanks court.
bryanrasmussen 11 September 2025
what are the ways you can poison or fake your location data, like if Verizon in response to this decides to offer a cheaper plan for sharing your location data?
its-kostya 11 September 2025
How much have they profited from selling this vs how much the fine was? Fines these days appear as just a cost of doing business.
malux85 11 September 2025
How much did they make selling the data?

If it's greater than the fine, and they suffer no other consequences (e.g. nobody goes to jail) then the fine is just cost-of-business.

The fine must be greater than what they made, AND some executives or management needs to be held responsible - at least fired.

Otherwise it will just keep happening.

electric_muse 11 September 2025
Carriers have been selling this stuff forever. The only surprise is that they were arrogant enough to argue it was outright legal rather than hiding behind “user consent” fine print.

The bigger issue is that every telecom treats location data as an asset class. If you think a court ruling will make them suddenly respect privacy, I’ve got a bridge to sell you. They’ll just bury consent deeper in the UX until it looks indistinguishable from compliance.

cwmoore 11 September 2025
Retroactively assign all future data value to...the next president?
eagerpace 11 September 2025
Are there any carriers that don’t do this?
xhkkffbf 11 September 2025
This may be the wrong time to ask this, but does anyone know where I can buy some location data? I don't want to ask for consent because I want the data (and the analysis) to be as general as possible.

That being said, I have a significant amount of flexibility. The data can be completely anonymized by stripping out the names, addresses etc. The location can be blurred by some radius that's roughly the size of the local census blocks groups. In other words, the location should be random enough to mix together 500-3000 people. The time can also be blurred by a radius of about a week or so. Options like differential privacy are encouraged.

The goal is not to track individuals, just get a rough measure of where they spend their time.

First, does anyone think this is a bad or dangerous set of data?

Second, if not, can anyone point me to some data brokers?

GJim 11 September 2025
So, when will 'murka wake up and protect its people with real data privacy laws like (or even better than) the GDPR?
tonyhart7 11 September 2025
even with user consent, they should ban it period
1oooqooq 11 September 2025
you have to constantly advertise your location to get cell service (by design, didn't have to be so)

stores scan your phone radio and also aggregate this data to map your store visit.

this was all done with credit cards in the 50s and then outlawed, hence: reward programs.

so, can't wait for Verizon to offer a cell coverage reward program that is nothing but a waiver to your data, just like reward programs from credit cards of yore.

taneq 11 September 2025
Oooh ooh now to Mastercard and your credit card transaction records!
Workaccount2 11 September 2025
Good.

Now apply it to Flock.

SilverElfin 11 September 2025
Great. Now jail the executives, pierce the veil, seize their assets.
slowhadoken 11 September 2025
Pretty soon you’re going to need insurance for your paycheck. When people are poorest that’s when corporate types turn the screws lmfao smh