We kept running into the same issue after decisions where everyone agreed in the meeting but execution slowed later. The problem wasn’t disagreement, it was unclear commitment.
All In is a small, free tool I built to quickly check whether people actually stand behind a decision or are quietly unsure.
After a decision, participants answer a single question independently. You see where support is solid, where it’s weak and where follow up is needed.
No accounts, no setup, no facilitation overhead.
It’s intentionally simple. Meant to be used right after decisions, before silence turns into delay.
Looks like some useful tools over there. What's missing for me is some data security declaration for where and how long data is stored and how the data is passed to third parties (AI?).
Maker here. Built this after repeatedly mistaking agreement for commitment in real projects. It’s free and intentionally minimal. Happy to answer questions or hear where this breaks down in real teams.
All In – a small tool to check real buyin after decisions
(cognu.app)12 points by anticlickwise 20 January 2026 | 8 comments
Comments
I don't like that words.
If I'm one of the proponents, I'll defend it.
If I'm against, I may accept and implement that decision, but I'm not going to die in that hill.
PS: Just reading this, brings me nightmares from the 2020 Zoom meetings.
Lots of meetings, and pretty “spirited” discussions during those meetings.
However, once consensus was reached, everyone fell in behind it, and supported it unequivocally. No “hidden resistance.”
One of the drawbacks to consensus decisions, though, is that everyone can agree on a crap decision.
There’s even an old fallacy about it, called The Abilene Paradox[0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abilene_paradox
All In is a small, free tool I built to quickly check whether people actually stand behind a decision or are quietly unsure.
After a decision, participants answer a single question independently. You see where support is solid, where it’s weak and where follow up is needed.
No accounts, no setup, no facilitation overhead.
It’s intentionally simple. Meant to be used right after decisions, before silence turns into delay.
Feedback very welcome.