Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

(iranintl.com)

Comments

sepisoad 1 hour ago
An iranian expat here. I have been following the news closely, mostly getting my data from my friends in Iran before the internet shutdown and after it was (sort of) lifted.

The death toll is way above this number, you have to consider the fact that Iran is a big country with many small cities, and in my city alone (which is very small and rarely has any protest going on) many people have died (i don’t have the exact numbers but it could be anywhere between 100 to 200) and when you put this into perspective you will understand that in scale of the entire country a lot of people have died.

I have heard that not only they killed people on the street but they have chased those who fled and killded them at their places or hidings, let alone the killing of the injured ones in hospitals.

It’s is a big tragedy and people are reluctant to talk about it because those who are committing this massacre are MUSLIMS and support PALESTINE so this is a moral dilemma for the left lovers! because they see Mullah’s regime as one of their biggest allies when it comes to attack West/Israel/Free market

It’s a shame that all those activist that would shred themselves for Palestine are absolutely quite about Iran

DoingIsLearning 1 hour ago
Irrespective of the accuracy of estimates it will be in the thousands, and most tragicly it will be very young men and women most of whom university educated, the very people that would be the country's tomorrow.
randcraw 12 minutes ago
Some mainstream coverage of this, at last.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/i...

jesseab 8 hours ago
The Wall Street Journal says at least 10,000 people were killed: https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/irans-protest-crackdow...

Horrifying.

caminante 26 January 2026
The source (Iran International) is backed by Saudi money and has a bias to dunk on Iran.

That said, I'm sure the death count numbers from the Rasht Massacre are staggeringly higher than the initial tallies of 2-5k.

bawolff 26 January 2026
That's crazy.

That's like ~40% of the deaths in the current gaza war, except over just 2 days instead of 2 years.

crazygringo 26 January 2026
For comparison, estimates of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre death count are usually put in the 300-1,000 range by journalists and human rights groups.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests...

ripped_britches 3 hours ago
Legitimate question - why am I not seeing this in the news? This is horrifying but where is the coverage?
koalaman 30 minutes ago
Iran and North Korea are evidence that with modern technology, and a ruthless enough autocracy, there is possibly no way out from under it. Technological progress only makes this problem worse. It should highlight the urgency for anybody who loves freedom, human rights, and democracy, to fight the swing towards authoritarianism in the 'free world', before there is no way back.
cm2012 26 January 2026
This is certainly the end of peaceful Iranian protests. Whether it leads to a violent revolution or a static police state like North Korea remains to be seen.
paulryanrogers 26 January 2026
How is this possible without explosives? Even with vehicle mounted machine guns it seems like a crazy high number. Did the protestors get boxed in somehow? And across so many locations, that seems to require a crazy amount of coordination to kill so many in so little time.
shevy-java 2 hours ago
That article does not explain how the alleged data was acquired.
Shorel 2 hours ago
It seems protesting a dictatorship, of whatever kind, is pointless and dangerous.

Meaning, the people should be able to defend themselves against the violence directed to them.

epolanski 4 hours ago
This is a tragedy.

I'm very against foreign forces intervening in such situations they can do more harm than good.

On the other hand, effective dictatorships (hell executive in democratic countries too) are good at controlling police and military.

E.g. take Belarus when it went through a wave of protests few years ago. I always think, if the people would really be against the regime, wouldn't members of the police and military know that?

Receive pressure from families and friends, even non direct one, clearly showing that the public thinks otherwise and they can easily topple those regimes? The moment your armed forces and police stops obeying orders those regimes are cooked. Yet they don't.

Which means that either there is no such an internal pressure or the regimes are extraordinarily good at selecting and incentivizing people to maintain the status quo.

Still, I think this is no excuse for foreign intervention and you should not do others what you don't wish on yourself. But at the same time if those regimes are indeed so effective, how do you get to help them?

I wish that at least instead of unilaterally, drastic measures were first sanctioned and carried out by UN, like it used to happen few decades ago in Africa.

But now it is always unilateral and stuff like what happened in Venezuela has been a tragedy imho where de facto a single country decides to topple the leadership of another one. Again, I don't wish we do what we don't wish for ourselves.

And I wouldn't want my country attacked and it's leadership decimated because somebody more powerful thinks so.

hggh 26 January 2026
Who designed this abomination of website? The "infinite" scroll is preventing me to get to the footer links.
bdelmas 4 hours ago
I really don’t understand why in the West there is nobody in the streets to protest but there was so many people for Palestine… Where are the people?
zrn900 58 minutes ago
hit8run 2 hours ago
The Islamic Republic represents what happens when Islamism achieves full, unchecked state power. The outcome is monstrous.
neuroelectron 1 hour ago
The pervasiveness of propaganda isn't really surprising nor is it complicated to recreate especially with today's AI and especially with state actor-scale AI.

It really seems more like a test to see how gullible people are when presented with mass confirmation bias and no evidence.

gmerc 26 January 2026
Take a good look US, because once you're down far enough the fascist drain, that's the cost of trying to claw your way back out. And there's no hope of external intervention given nuclear arms
alphawhisky 33 minutes ago
Another resounding moral defeat for Abrahamic religion. How much longer till everyone is fed up with the crusades?
ozlikethewizard 26 January 2026
The source is certainly unreliable, a quick scan of the wiki sources give you that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_International

But does the number even matter? Whether its 4000 or 35000 the conduct has been unacceptable.

The real question is the solution, is reporting like this designed to be used as the backdrop to foreign intervention? How many people will be killed then?

"one death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic" - Not Stalin

jdthedisciple 7 hours ago
Dban1 26 January 2026
The internet is fragile. Access can be so easily cut off for the masses in dire times.
sunshengguang 26 January 2026
He’s talking his book
epsters 3 hours ago
36,500 dead, 300,000 injured, In 2 days? People are buying this? Unarmed protesters tend to flee when the shooting starts and armed protesters shoot back. And all this without heavy weapons? Do people remember what Gaza turned into get to that toll?

The actual final toll number is certainly in the thousands But all the numbers being touted in the western press reek of desperation. Lot of the sources are western-backed anti-iranian ngos ( lot of them with cia, mossad and other intelligence ties) which themselves cite dubious sources. IranIntl is itself Saudi-backed and a Mossad asset according to Axios's Barak Ravid, who is himself worked for Israel's Unit 8200. Netanyahu seems to try rope the US into war in the short window before the US mid-terms and the Monarchists seem similarly desperate to show traction to the Trump admin. With Epstein and whatever else that is hanging over Trump's head this is a very dangerous trap.

Thaxll 26 January 2026
But hey, help is coming.
FilosofumRex 9 hours ago
"Iran International", isn't registered anywhere in the US or traceable to any reputable source, it has no reporters in Iran but claims to have access to "classified" documents of IRGC. This wreaks of desperation at a failed coup

IRGC is not involved in internal affairs, it's Iran's special forces and focuses on strategic defense forces.

ares623 26 January 2026
I can't comprehend how a population can kill that many of their own people. They aren't even an "other" people, which has been the most common scapegoat lately. Same skin color, same religion, same language, same homeland.
yieldcrv 26 January 2026
hm, I think we should re-evaluate sanctioning or civilian pressure campaigns, since the guise is for them to coax or turn on the government for regime change, but the government can just hire mercenaries from outside the country.

don't know a solution but this one isn't it

Markoff 26 January 2026
brought to you by unbiased quality sources on par with those which claimed WMD in Iraq... /s
SilverElfin 7 hours ago
What happened to Trump threatening to invade? This is the one situation that intervention is called for.
mishaker 3 hours ago
awesome ! more than 2 years into genocide in Gaza and not a single word on HN. And now a fake news published by a zionist website (iranintl.com is financed and supported by Israel) gets on the first page ! so disgusting.
chaosbolt 2 hours ago
I heard the number was much higher than that, they massacred 6 million iranians during those protests.

I mean, this is the nail in the coffin, I'm removing my hacker news account, this is even worse than reddit in propaganda.

ursuscamp 26 January 2026
This is depressing because we will go to war over this and it’s going to be five years before people realizing they were tricked by “babies in incubators” propaganda.
iammjm 6 hours ago
This is partially on America. Didnt Trump publicly encourage the protesters and promised that the help is on the way?
lucasRW 3 hours ago
The silence of MSM (particularly the BBC) is eye-opening.
CrzyLngPwd 6 hours ago
Looks more like a civil war or an insurrection rather than peaceful protests every time the numbers are pulled up.
midtake 6 hours ago
36,500 seems awfully high. Did they just stand there? Those are numbers you'd see in a war, not a 2-day crackdown on protestors with small arms.
vogre 7 hours ago
That number would inevitably lead to tons of videos with piles of corpses and cities covered with dead.

Like ones that appear when west-backed Julani killed Alawites. But there is almost no such content - only rumors, unnamed sources and documents no one bother to check.

throw310822 3 hours ago
Be aware that all this might be the usual propaganda campaign that precedes US's "regime change" wars to make them appear as justified and necessary to the general public. This has been done so many times now that it's incredible people keep falling for it.